Sexy standardization saves, um, cost

image: wikimedia.org No, I am not touching on brassieres here, where standardization could save the beauties in our life some time shopping, should the industry finally agree on more reliable size and fit standards. For most other clothing the garment industry has standardized pretty well, but then that is less crucial in fit and less intensely looked at, right?

Yes, standardization can be sexy and it does save cost

image from www.flickr.com / cocreatr

The value of standardization

Standards reduce cost and hassle, because they make products and services interoperable. They make markets more accessible to consumers, makers, and suppliers. Standards make safety, performance, and other compliance assessments and certification affordable, further adding to trust between global trading partners.

As in this example, you can buy bolts in bulk from Germany, and nuts in lots from Japan, and – ta-da – they have perfect fit for effective, um, screwing on the assembly line. The profits and success of using standards are obvious, on one hand.

On the other hand, the first problem with standards: there are so many to choose from. The second problem: because technology innovation speeds up ever faster, standardization agreements and committe work can hardly keep up. Actually they fall behind, and they know it. The tech geniuses and wizards in society are out-creating the standardization bodies. Adding manpower, even if they are technology experts, is not a promising solution.

Old standards not so sexy

When new, technology is sexy, for many of us (if not for you, why are you still reading this?). Standards may make products and services affordable, for one,  by leveling the playing field for many entrants. But, coming into existence by a semi-open process of building agreement and inviting public comment, standards may take years to catch up, be acepted and finally and add value to the creative meanderings and compromises of high-tech development leaders and consortia. Open Source and the maker movement may be exceptions to this general industrial era experience.

Technology Diffusion proprietary standardized
research usual rare
inovation most few
early adoption much little
early majority some some
late majority few most
laggards, resistors
who cares

Update 2010-12-05

This topic is cross-posted from my personal blog to give it here more of the space it deserves.

Advertisements

About CoCreatr

A little here, a little there, virtually. Focus, filter, fortify, and forward.
This entry was posted in Collective Intelligence, Learn - Live - Repeat, Start Something and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Sexy standardization saves, um, cost

  1. Pingback: On the economic benefits of standardization | Stand on Standards

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s